Skip to content

The NeoMarxist Politically Correct

July 13, 2016

It is long past time for those of us who are committed to faith and freedom to call out the Neo-Marxist purveyors of Political Correctness for corrupting the political process. Political Correctness is not about being polite or considerate of other people’s feelings, it is a Neo-Marxist strategy to silence common sense opposition to their radical agenda. Many may be shocked that someone would label the pushers of Political Correctness as Neo-Marxists. Since the downfall of Joe McCarthy’s anticommunist crusade in the 1950s calling people Marxists has been socially taboo. Those cognizant of the dangers posed by the Politically Correct often refer to them as Liberals or Fascists or Leftists, but these labels are inaccurate. True Liberals support free speech even for those with different opinions. The goal of the purveyors of PC Neo-Marxism is to silence the speech of anyone who disagrees with them. Fascists and Neo-Marxists are totalitarian by nature and want their opposition shut down, but Fascist are racists, sexists, and side with oppressors. PC Neo-Marxists champion the cause of the oppressed. While traditional Marxists focused on economics, PC Neo-Marxists are concerned with race and sex.

One of the prime strategies of the PC Neo-Marxists is to howl every time someone points out their Marxist roots; however if you look at whom they quote, it is usually Marxists. The Politically Correct follow Marxist ideology, whose guiding principle is: All history is the history of class struggle – the oppressors against the oppressed. The Neo-Marxists approach every situation by dividing people into the oppressed and the oppressors: White oppressors, blacks oppressed, men versus women, rich versus poor, Christians versus LGBTQ, and so on.

The PC Neo-Marxists’ objective is to foment revolution by stoking anger in the oppressed class against their oppressors by focusing on instances of injustice and looking for evidence of discrimination. As real discrimination diminishes, they whine about micro-aggressions.

The strategies of the PC Neo-Marxists may be puzzling if you don’t understand their ideological roots. According them, oppressors have no rights. Thus Black Lives Matter activists expressed outrage when someone suggested that white lives also matter. For the PC Neo-Marxist, whites are oppressors and therefore, for them white lives don’t matter.

Chai Feldblum, a lesbian appointed to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, is a perfect example of the PC Neo-Marxism. According to her, when religious liberty and sexual liberty conflict, she admits, “I’m having a hard time coming up with any case in which religious liberty should win.”[1]

PC Neo-Marxists attack anyone who uses language they have deemed offensive, claiming that is wrong to hurt people’s feelings, but they are only concerned with the feelings of the oppressed. They routinely engage in vicious name calling, labeling their critics racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, Islamaphobic, xenophobic, bigoted haters. While they claim to want to empower the oppressed, it is professors, diversity enforcers, and community activists who benefit and increase their influence and funding.

How did the PC Neo-Marxism gain respectability? PC Neo-Marxist radicals of the 60s became professors in the 80s and now dominate the majority of educational institutions, systematically discriminating against anyone who doesn’t accept to PC orthodoxy. Parents are conned into paying the ever-inflating price for higher education. Hoping to insure their children’s financial future, parents send them to colleges where they are systematically indoctrinated by PC Neo-Marxist professors.

PC Neo Marxist solutions rarely improve the situation of the oppressed. When their schemes inevitably fail, they blame bigotry, discrimination, and stigma. Actually solving problems would blunt the anger of the oppressed, deprive the activists of things to complain about, and delay the revolution. Real solutions are, therefore, inconsistent with the goals of the PC Neo-Marxists. Black Lives Matter want riots and conflict, which will drive business out of already deprived areas and lead to more crime.

As Christians we must be concerned about the plight of the poor and those denied equal rights. Sincere believers can, however, be seduced by stories of real injustice into supporting PC Neo-Marxist activism or worse react to PC rhetoric by hardening their heart to real suffering. The Christian answer to the ideology of class struggle is the solidarity of mutual concern and care.

We are in the midst of a world-wide culture war. The temptation is to take up arms against the PC Neo-Marxists and confront them with finely honed arguments. These comfort our friends, but the PC Neo-Marxists will not be defeated with logic or facts. Their weapons are anger, bitterness, unforgiveness, and self-pity, with these they trap the wounded in self-destructive behaviors. The PC Neo-Marxists can’t heal or save, they can only destroy. We have the healing power of the Father’s love, the joy of the Gospel, the truth that liberates, and confident spirit-inspired prayer. These always triumph in the end.

[1]  http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/391301/chai-feldblums-claim-i-misquoted-her-maggie-gallagher

Advertisements
4 Comments leave one →
  1. Black Metal Valkyrie permalink
    July 14, 2016 2:29 pm

    I wouldn’t use the term Marxist. Transgenderism is a liberal movement falsely claiming that personally deciding to change your body is some revolutionary act. The difference between liberalism and leftism is leftism wants a whole new economic, political and social order through a violent revolution that destroys this society while liberals want progress through legal reforms to meet their ideals. Check out the communist org LLCO. They say lots of things that would piss off SJWs. Also check out Marxist Youtuber Maoist Rebel News. He is not politically correct.

  2. July 14, 2016 4:57 pm

    Why does it matter that the core ideology of Black Lives Matter, pro-abortion feminists, and sexual revolutionaries is NeoMarxism?
    I listen to the talking heads struggle to make sense of the feminists who don’t care about women’s suffering, the BLM activists who don’t care about the lives of black men, women, and children murdered in urban ghettos, the gay activists who sabotage HIV/STD prevention programs and hide the continuing epidemic, and supposed Liberals who don’t care about freedom of religion and speech.
    I felt the same frustration in the 1980’s when I was debating prochoicers. Two friends enlightened me, “They are Marxist.” They told me to read Engels The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, Shulamith Firestone’s The Dialectic of Sex, and David Horowitz’s Destructive Generation. I did and it all made sense.
    The goal of NeoMarxists is class struggle leading to revolution, and all power to the oppressed. They aren’t interested in solving problems or alleviating real suffering. They oppose anything that dampens the anger of the oppressed classes.
    NeoMarxists use violence, resort to name-calling, deny human rights, and don’t care how many people die. In this, they are more like the terrorists of ISIS than the traditional Liberals who have foolishly made common cause with them.
    Until we understand their true objectives, and call them out, the NeoMarxists among us will continue to divide and destroy

  3. anonymous permalink
    July 17, 2016 1:21 pm

    It is disingenuous to suggest that the phrase “Black lives matter” implies that white (or Asian or Latino or…) lives don’t matter. That phrase and that movement are a response to a specific situation, i.e the perception that, for dominant white society, the lives of black people are worthless. It’s like saying ” The lives are unborn babies are precious.” It does not imply that the lives of people who are born are not precious.

    • July 17, 2016 5:13 pm

      Conservatives care very much about black fellow citizens living in urban ghettos. They see the problem as the fault of teachers’ unions that have blocked funding for charter and private schools, leaving minority students with a second rate education. Black men in the ghetto angry at authority. Is it because 70% of them are born into father absent families? Minorities have not be betrayed by the police, but by the Democrat politicians they elected who have pandered to them rather than solve real problems. I stand by my original claim, NeoMarxists activists (many of them white) under the banner Black Lives Matter have taken advantage of real problems and used them to foment class struggle. Marches and demonstrations solve none of the real problems.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: